Investing                                                                            Listen to Money Talk
"The Below The Radar Hedge Fund Crisis" - Selengut

Tim Sykes talks about turning $12,000 gift into nearly $2 Million as a day trader on the MTN Main Audio Channel Listen

Great Investing Websites
 
Elitetrader.com
The #1 community for active traders of Stocks, Futures, Options, and Currencies
Sponsors
 
 
 

FreeBirthday.com
It's Your Birthday. Everything should be FREE!


 Featured Investment Experts

Tim Sykes

5 Reasons Penny Stock Trading Obliterates Forex Trading



1. The unlimited profit potential in the hugely liquid and leveraged forex market is pure marketing and deception, designed to lure the most desperate and greediest people into playing a game where the odds of success are very low similar to playing the lottery. If you look at the actual statistics, they point to the vast majority of traders not just blowing up their entire account within a few months, but also owing money due to the easy-to-use leverage. Unless you are illiterate and a complete moron, it is extremely difficult to blow up a penny stock trading account, mainly because the trading rules I teach are very conservative, designed to keep traders learning and earning gradually over time.

2. Because Forex is so liquid and leveraged, those who succeed are the smartest, richest and most well informed people on the planet, aka George Soros and his friends. You simply do not have the intelligence, wealth or access to quality information and analysis that they do so why try to compete against them? As evidenced by the recent fraud case against SpongeTech and PennyStockChaser, those promoters and management have the intelligence level of Forrest Gump. I can make a thousand analogies explaining why it's SO much easier to trade against these morons, but after you try out my free video lessons and begin to see it all yourself, you won't need me to teach you anymore, you'll be self-sufficient which is my entire goal!

3. Forex prices move very quickly and the reaction to breaking news happens within seconds and minutes. Because penny stock manipulation takes time to plan and enact and the people trading the stocks are practically illiterate, it takes hours and days for price to fulfill their predictable patterns giving you plenty of time to prepare and participate in each trade. The best analogy is penny stocks are like Little League whereas Forex is the Major Leagues. When you're coming up to bat would you like a 100mph fastball or a floater thrown by a nine-year old?

4. Penny stocks are simpler. While forex prices gyrate wildly due to rumors, news and those anticipating the rumors and news, volatile penny stock chart patterns are truly straight up and then straight down with very little variation. That is the beauty of trading pump and dumps, the chart patterns are like pendulums and you just need to learn how to buy on the way up and short sell on the way down. Or choose one side and specialize in that.

5. Penny stocks have greater odds of success. Sure, sure, it's far less money and you don't get the gambling thrill you do with Forex since down here in the gutter it's more like taking candy from babies (or those who are have the intelligence of babies), but we are winning approximately 75% of the time.

I’ve put together an in-depth (and free) video lesson series that will teach you everything I know about Pennystocks. Rather than just hearing me talk about my strategy and my thoughts, signup to my free video lesson series so you can learn from the specific trades and patterns themselves.
###

      
              
Bret Rosenthal

Principal of RCM, LLC,
and founding partner of the
Fortune's Favor Family of Funds

Rosenthal Capital Management, LLC




 
Steve Selengut

Professional Investment Management from 1979
Author of: "The Brainwashing of the American Investor: The Book that Wall Street Does Not Want YOU to Read,", and "A Millionaire's Secret
Investment Strategy"
http://www.sancoservices.com/
http://www.kiawahgolfinvestmentseminars.com/

May The Investment Force Be With You

Investment markets got you down, Bunkie? Been blown away by
derivative stun guns? When will portfolio market values move
back to 2007 levels--- and then what will you do about it?

It's time to overthrow the evil Masters of the Universe and deactivate
their weapons of financial destruction. Let's outlaw the brainwashing
that has changed how average investors look at and value their
investment portfolios.

It's time to exorcize the Wall Street demons and return to stocks
and bonds--- and to QDI, "the Force" for long-term investment portfolio
security.

Speculating is complicated, even for financial rocket scientists.
What most of us want (or would certainly settle for) is simplicity,
stability, and reasonable growth in our productive working capital.

A return to plain vanilla investing strategies with operating procedures
that minimize risk and encourage understanding of the financial
markets needs to become part of our financial force field.

As bad as things have been since this black hole appeared, investment
models true to fundamental concepts, simple strategies, and disciplined operating rules have probably bettered the market numbers in at least six important ways:

One - Higher lows during market downturns: Equity portfolios managed
using basic principles of quality, diversification, and income (the QDI)
and disciplined profit taking rules should not fall as much in market
value as most mutual funds or poorly diversified portfolios.

Constant cash flow, even if not reinvested, places a floor under market
values, and investors feel better when their values fall less than the
market averages. In soundly managed programs, buying activity slows
as prices rise--- increasing "smart cash" for buying at lower levels later
.

Two - Moves to cash or other sectors before bubbles burst: Disciplined
profit taking automatically moves dollars from overheated sectors to
cash or undervalued sectors during rising markets. This process creates capital that can be used to lower the average cost of remaining positions or to take advantage of new opportunities.

Investors feel better when no profits have been left on the table.

Three - Maintenance of planned income streams during financial crises: Most financial plans focus so strongly on growing market values that  they lose touch with the need for planning a dependable retirement income. They rely on selling equity fund units or inflated indices for cash flow, instead of generating stable income with less exciting cash producing staples.

Steadily increasing annual income can be placed on "cruise control"
through the use of the cost basis asset allocation methods contained
 in the WCM (Working Capital Model). How many would-be retirees
are searching for jobs because of improper income planning?

Four - Faster movement to new all time market value highs: When investors have a reasonable understanding of the various cycles impacting their investment portfolios, they develop valid expectations about the market value "performance" of their portfolios.

They are less likely to initiate knee-jerk or panic driven transactions and
more likely to take advantage of the new opportunities that lower security prices always create. Additionally, higher quality securities invariably are in the first group to regain popularity with investors as good news reports begin to dominate.

Five - Steady growth in working capital in all market environments: Working capital is measured in terms of cost basis instead of market price. As a result, all income generated from interest, dividends, and realized gains grow working capital regardless of the direction of market prices.

A treasury bond generates the same income at $85 as at $115. Most
closed-end municipal bond funds (CEFs) maintained their 5% to 7%
tax-free cash flow throughout the financial crisis--- in spite of their
reduced market values. Similarly, short-term profits on high quality
securities have been growing working capital since the current rally
took hold in March.

Six - Annual growth in realized "base income" in standard portfolios: WCM portfolios are income machines by design. No security is ever purchased if it does not produce regular dividend or interest payments; at least 30% of all base income should be reallocated to income-objective securities.

Similarly, every dollar of capital gains income, and net portfolio additions are partially allocated to income producers--- and the use of a cost based asset allocation formula insures annual income growth.

Few financial professionals begin their careers with any encouragement to become comfortable with individual equity securities and the surprisingly large variety of individual, relatively uncomplicated, and generally safe(r) income producers available for their clients.

Financial products are far more lucrative for their institutional employers
and, as a result, the incentives for brokers and advisors to sell products is pretty much irresistible. Few pros can afford to be one with "The Force".

The Dark Side of investing beckons like a Siren's song, luring the majority of professional advisors away from the safety and simplicity of QDI.  Institutional propaganda, projections, predictions, and hype have the same affect on unsuspecting boatloads of speculators who most often become shipwrecked on the derivative rocks.

Investors and their professionals need to re-evaluate their product orientation and plot a global escape from the Dark Side of investing.

Contact the "Skywalker" foundation for emotional and financial support while making the transition--- and may the force be with you.

Steve Selengut
http://www.kiawahgolfinvestmentseminars.com/InvestmentWorkshopWebinars.htm
Author of: "The Brainwashing of the American Investor: The Book that Wall Street Does Not Want YOU to Read", and "A Millionaire's Secret Investment Strategy" PGA Village Golf Outing - Seminar October 2009
 


 Will I Outlive My Capital?

Three Tips to Help Investors Manage Their Own Portfolios

Wall Street is a mess, and investors are not happy.

 

As the federal government bails out “too big to fail” companies like AIG and Merrill Lynch, investors are worried that the big brokerage firms they depended on to safeguard their futures aren’t up to the task anymore. As a result, many investors – big and small – are taking their portfolios away from their advisors and brokers and managing their investments themselves.

 

That’s what John O’Donnell, Chief Knowledge Officer of Online Trading Academy (www.tradingacademy.com) said is happening, based on what he sees as a dramatic influx of people who are taking steps to learn about navigating the markets’ waters themselves.

 

“It’s raining hard and heavy out there, and people are afraid that the people who have been guiding their investments aren’t up to avoiding the deep puddles anymore,” O’Donnell said. “Their 401Ks are turning into 201Ks, and 50 percent of the homes in America with stock holdings lost money last year, and one in five of the homes these people are living in are now mired in negative equity. People are starting to ask the question, ‘Will I outlive my capital?’ so something had to give.”


O’Donnell is seeing the trend reflected in the changes inside his own company, a global network of financial education centers aimed at teaching the modern investor how to pilot their investments through the pitfalls.

 

Online Trading Academy has seen a dramatic increase in students, which range in the key trading demographic of 45-70 year olds. The changes reflected in O’Donnell’s business show that:

 

·        Franchise locations are booming – The Company opened 12 new offices during the last 15 months – during the deepest recession in decades. That constitutes a 33 percent increase in the number of locations.

 

·        Enrollments – The number of students enrolled at the school has doubled every year for four consecutive years.

 

·        Age of enrollees – New students coming in are averaging in the 60-year-old range, a demographic that has traditionally hired brokers or advisors to help manage their money.

 

“The average individual investor has been led to believe that ‘buy and hold’ is the best approach, that mutual funds are a smart investment, and that professionals will do a better job of managing their money,” O’Donnell said. “The most important lesson the market has taught us is that those basic strategies don’t hold water anymore.  Buy and hold just isn’t enough. The word ‘trading’ has traditionally been associated with risky behavior, but the truth is the average buy and hold investor has lost more than 40 percent of their life’s savings.”

 

O’Donnell believes that three guiding principles can help investors take control successfully:

 

  • Accept that the old investing rules don’t apply anymore, but with and education and active portfolio management, you  have an opportunity make money in any market condition

  • Learn to let go of any bias you may have for market direction, asset class or time frame and simply let the market tell you where the opportunities are.  Learn to become a market-driven trader.

  • Stop listening to the noise that surrounds that market and start listening to the market itself.

“The old rules don’t apply anymore,” he added. “The old rulebook doesn’t work. Down is up and left is right, so people are figuring out the fact that the only way to better invest their money is to know, for themselves, how the markets work and decide independently where they should stake their futures.”

                                   ###


 The Below The Radar Hedge Fund Crisis
by Steve Selengut

The other day, with the market giving up about a third of its March
gainin DJIA points, I went looking through my favorite market stats
to see if any remaining profits could be pounced upon. Typically, profit possibilities can be identified quickly on NYSE lists of the largest
dollar and percent gainers.

Alarmingly, 75% of the largest percent gainers were ETFs, and
many of those operate using the same strategies as classic
hedge funds--- most owned no common stock at all! At the same
time, 93% of the largest dollar gainers were ETFs with a large proportion plainly operating like a hedge fund.
 
 

Earlier in March, while we were all sunning ourselves in the
far-too-infrequent-lately UVs of a brief rally, I was doing a similar
search for undervalued IGVSI stocks. Yes, Virginia, there is an equally impressive array of hedge funds betting that the markets (and the South) actually will rise again.

What is a hedge fund, and just what does it try to accomplish?
I think the key legal element is that they don't say how they intend
 to get the job done.
 

Initially, hedging was used as a risk mollifier in the securities markets
in the same way as insurance is used for protection against disasters impacting life, health, and personal property. Taking a short position
on an owned security, for example, protects an investor's profit if the company's market price plunges.

Naked shorting, shorting baskets of securities, and shorting indices,
however, have morphed into a risk creator, not a risk reducer. Similarly,
hedge funds that hold index funds as betting devices on market sector performance are not what the investment gods envisioned when they
blessed the sector experiment. 
 

The new definition of hedge fund speaks of an aggressively managed
entity that uses leverage, long, short, options, futures, and derivative
positions with the goal of generating high returns. Risk reduction is no
longer the objective.

Hedge funds have never been regulated like their open-end mutual fund cousins--- the rationale being that they cater to a wealthy and
sophisticated clientele.
In fact, the law requires that participants in
hedge funds jump over income, net worth, and investment high-hurdles
before being eligible to participate.
 
 

Investopedia refers to them as mutual funds for the super rich, but the
only similarities to the plain vanilla equity mutual fund are the pooling of participants' money and professional management. During the past
decade, a series of ill advised and shortsighted rules changes gave
hedge fund managers destructive powers that exacerbated the financial
crisis that will mourn its second anniversary this summer.

But regulating the hedge fund is clearly a too late closing of a barn door encrusted with diamonds (no pun intended). A few years ago, the masters of the universe rediscovered, redefined, and complicated the world of closed end mutual funds by creating many different forms of passively managed index/hedge funds.

As innocent as these funds may appear, they too have altered the
investment
landscape. Speculators (not investors) place their bets on the rise or fall of the index. These bets artificially impact the market price of securities because many (if not all) of the funds actually own the securities they are tracking.

Additionally, many individual stocks fall into several indices, and most
of the major ETF marketing companies sell similar index funds. Didn't
 we just go through this with mortgage-backed securities? Aren't
these funds artificially taking common stock pricing further and further
away from the fundamentals of the companies themselves?
 
 

Today, it appears that every passive fund has two or three accompanying short/bear ETFs plus an equal number of bull/long funds to choose from.

Apparently, the SEC has not taken the trouble to look inside the
thousands of boutique ETFs that by now must outnumber the securities
they are tracking.

Wall Street wants all CEFs (index, hedge, bond, equity, real estate,
whatever) to be regulated and reported upon as though they were simply common stocks. As a whole, they aren't even close. In fact, there are more of these derivatives traded on the NYSE than common stocks and preferred stocks combined.

And the real crime is this: investors as naive as the wet-diapered E-Trade spokesbaby can push a button and buy operational hedge funds more bizarre and sophisticated than any ever imagined buy the rich and famous.

If an ETF harbors a hedge fund, but doesn't call it a hedge fund, is it
really not a hedge fund? If Merrill Lynch creates a mutual fund with pro rata individual account statements, is it any less of a mutual fund? Is it really individual account management? Have the commissions really
disappeared? The SEC thought so.
 

Shouldn't the regulators be smart enough (and brave enough) to put an
end to these legal-in-name-only frauds? Should your mother's IRA be speculating in puts on Netherlands Tulip Bulb futures? How about 200% of the inverse of the Financial Select Sector Index?

A search at ETF-Connect for US Equity ETFs finds roughly 500 potential speculations that absolutely anyone can buy into. All are self-directed
IRA eligible--- 401(k) eligible, possibly. A look inside reveals
hedge-fund-like operations. But technically, they are not hedge funds
because they describe the strategies employed. 
 

So long as we tolerate Wall Street attorneys circumventing the intent
of our securities laws, and so long as we reward regulators for their blind worship of the letter of these laws, we will have this kind of manipulation.

Index ETFs (and the no doubt about it hedge fund casinos they front)
need a league of their own, located in Vegas, AC, or Uncasville. (A free "Brainwashing" book to the first three people who explain Uncasville!) They demand a new rulebook that recognizes content and strategy--- not trading form.
 

The ETF derivative market requires a fresh new breed of big picture aware, loophole fillers --- the Obama team is accepting applications.

Whatever happened to stocks and bonds? 

 

 

 

 







Web Hosting Companies